(extracted from another forum)
Forum : Is Ubin fence really needed?
I REFER to the article,
'New Ubin fence to stop illegal entry' (ST, May 9). On that same day, I happened to kayak around Pulau Ubin.
To a nature lover like myself, the metal posts are a real eyesore. They just do not fit into the natural surroundings and they make Ubin look like a prison island.
I also wonder about the impact that the fence will have on the island's flora and fauna as it covers a large area.
As suggested by Lee Poh Onn in the commentary, 'Looking after nature...and the economy' (ST, May 2), why not conduct an environmental impact assessment of the fence and release the report to the public so that people can be convinced that there will be no negative impact on the ecology?
Perhaps the Police Coast Guard could also inform the public about the severity of the illegal immigrant situation on Pulau Ubin? Is the situation so bad that the fence has to be built? Is there another solution that is more environmentally friendly?
Singapore has very high standards for cleanliness and law and order. This is its strength in fighting diseases such as Sars.
However, I feel that there is a tendency to be overly clean in the management of nature sites.
For example,
not all nature areas need to have boardwalks. Not all nature areas need to be opened for large number of visitors.
I often feel that Singapore's nature areas are a bit too sanitised. How about leaving some nature areas as they are? One example would be the deeper and more pristine part of the central catchment area. Perhaps a place like this should be left alone as it is now for research purposes.
It is beyond doubt that dealing with issues such as illegal immigration and adequate water supply is critical to the nation's survival.
But these are issues that
other countries have to deal with too.
Perhaps we can continue to compare notes and learn from other countries ways of putting more environmentally friendly solutions in place.
Sustainable development is the key. Conservation has become a complex matter. One can no longer stand by the roadside and shout 'Stop killing whales!' and hope to be heard and taken seriously.
Conservationists have to understand issues such as population explosion, birth control, water shortage in dry areas, firewood shortage in bitterly cold winters and economic survival.
Human beings are the only species on earth with the capability to change the landscape drastically. We have been doing that for centuries.
We are also the only species that can protect animals and plants from disappearing forever from this earth.
Through our ignorance and the need to grow, humans moving into a natural habitat have usually changed the landscape drastically by logging, mining, setting up new townships or over-harvesting, causing precious plants and animals there to become extinct.
We have been treating the land and ocean as an endless food supply and sewage disposal system. The story is the same all over the world.
But there have been battles fought and won. The orang-utans in Borneo have found a little haven in Sepilok and, closer to home, Chek Jawa has been saved. These are stories to spur us on.
I would also like to urge conservationists and nature lovers to be global in their work, as well as acting locally.
We should try to care for the endangered gorillas in Africa and polar bears in the frozen Arctic. I like to think of myself as a citizen of Planet Earth who happens to be a Singaporean.
We cannot mourn for the past but we can save what we have now.
However, if images and stories in the media are any indication to go by, we do not have much time left. It would be tragic if
our children grew up knowing only plastic, concrete, glass and metal, and thinking that animals are to be found only in zoos. We have only one Himalayas, one Amazon, one Antarctica and one Pulau Ubin. Let us protect them for ourselves, for our own well-being and for our children to experience, enjoy and learn from.
KHOO SWEE CHIOW
